Comments for jan on ruby

Comment on Chose Freeswitch over Asterisk by Diego Viola

Diego Viola — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:33:13 +0000

I wish coppice will make some great VAD algorithm for FS, he is very talented =D.

Comment on Abandoned this blog by RaiulBaztepo

RaiulBaztepo — Sat, 28 Mar 2009 22:53:43 +0000

Hello!
Very Interesting post! Thank you for such interesting resource!
PS: Sorry for my bad english, I’v just started to learn this language ;)
See you!
Your, Raiul Baztepo

Comment on Merb can’t connect to the database with data_objects_adapter.rb:137:in `initialize’: wrong number of arguments (8 for 1) (ArgumentError) by Flying Machine Studios » Blog Archive » Upgrading from Merb 1.0 to 1.0.3

Tue, 02 Dec 2008 17:40:53 +0000

[...] installing dm-core from source (solves the problem described here [...]

Comment on Chose Freeswitch over Asterisk by Diego Viola

Diego Viola — Sun, 30 Nov 2008 18:14:51 +0000

The only thing I don’t like about FS is it’s VAD module.

It’s not very efficient, I hope they will replace it with something that works better soon.

Comment on Merb can’t connect to the database with data_objects_adapter.rb:137:in `initialize’: wrong number of arguments (8 for 1) (ArgumentError) by Jan Kubr

Jan Kubr — Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:24:35 +0000

Yeah. And the issue with the version of dm-tags has been fixed a few hours ago, too. Just need to wait for the gems to be synced (could install dm-tags from Github locally, not on my Linux server though).
Oh well, flexibility comes with a price.

Comment on Merb can’t connect to the database with data_objects_adapter.rb:137:in `initialize’: wrong number of arguments (8 for 1) (ArgumentError) by Michael Klishin

Michael Klishin — Tue, 18 Nov 2008 19:54:58 +0000

This is a DataMapper “issue” and it is already resolved. The problem was with Addressable 2.0 featured a breaking API change.

Comment on Chose Freeswitch over Asterisk by Diego Viola

Diego Viola — Sat, 15 Nov 2008 05:07:32 +0000

FreeSWITCH kicks Asterisk ass in every possible way.

Comment on Ruby is not slow by Jan Kubr

Jan Kubr — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 07:47:52 +0000

Oh web servers are optimized in C. Now that makes sense.
Really recommend everyone who hasn’t yet to watch the talk: http://www.merbcamp.com/video/katz3.mp4

Comment on Ruby is not slow by Jan Kubr

Jan Kubr — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 07:23:01 +0000

OK so I was wrong in the end. (Since higher is better in the table) CakePHP was the slowest one. So why use it for comparison when CodeIgniter is still four times slower than Rails?

And isn’t it a problem of deployment/runtime of PHP frameworks then?
I’m not sure I follow you on the “Ruby on the Web is faster than PHP while the PHP language is faster than Ruby.” Isn’t it the same Ruby running “on the web”?
I should go watch the keynote I guess..

Comment on Ruby is not slow by Matt Aimonetti

Matt Aimonetti — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 00:02:34 +0000

Actually, CodeIgniter http://codeigniter.com/ is the fastest PHP framework we tested. The problem is that PHP has to reload the entire framework for each request. On the other hand, in Ruby land we optimized our system and went down to C when we needed speed, which explains why Ruby for the Web is way faster than PHP for the web, even though, as a language, PHP is faster.

Once again, people should benchmark stuff they would use the language for, not stuff they won’t use (i.e: fibonacci)